If
<= is both transitive and complete, then it is a rational preference relation.
If
a consumer has a preference relation that violates transitivity, then an inscrupulous
person can milk them as follows. Suppose the consumer has an apple, and prefers
apples to oranges, oranges to bananas, and bananas to apples. Then, the consumer
would be prepared to pay, say, one cent to trade their apple for a banana, because
they prefer bananas to apples. After that, they would pay once cent to trade their
banana for an orange, and again the orange for an apple, and so on.
Completeness
is more philosophically questionable. In most applications, S is an infinite set
and the consumer is not conscious of all preferences. For example, one does not
have to make up one's mind about whether one prefers to go on holiday by plane
or by train if one does not have enough money to go on holiday anyway (although
it can be nice to dream about what one would do if one would win the lottery).
However, preference can be interpreted as a hypothetical choice that could be
made rather than a conscious state of mind. In this case, completeness amounts
to an assumption that the consumer can always make up their mind whether they
are indifferent or prefer one option when presented with any pair of options.
Behavioral
economics investigates the circumstances when human behavior is consistent and
inconsistent with these assumptions.
The
indifference relation ~ is an equivalence relation. Thus we have a quotient set
S/~ of equivalence classes of S, which forms a partition of S. Each equivalence
class is a set of packages that is equally preferred. If there are only two commodities,
the equivalence classes can be graphically represented as indifference curves.
Based on the preference relation on S we have a preference relation on S/~. As
opposed to the former, the latter is antisymmetric and a total order.
It
is usually more convenient to describe a preference relation on S with a utility
function , such that u(a)<=u(b) if and only if a<=b. A continuous utility
function always exists if <= is a continuous rational preference relation on
Rn. For any such preference relation, there are many continuous utility functions
that represent it. Conversely, every utility function can be used to construct
a unique preference relation.
All
the above is independent of the prices of the goods and services and independent
of the budget of the consumer. These determine the feasible packages (those he
or she can afford). In principle the consumer chooses a package within his or
her budget such that no other feasible package is preferred over it; the utility
is maximized.
References
Kreps,
David (1990). A Course in Microeconomic Theory. New Jersey: Princeton University
Press. ISBN 0691042640
Mas-Colell,
Andreu; Whinston, Michael; & Green, Jerry (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195073401